Fed up, Steve Bannon lashes out at Speaker Johnson over NDAA passage
The National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2024: Conservatives React
The National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2024 is currently awaiting President Joe Biden’s signature, and it has sparked controversy among conservatives.
According to CNN, the $886.3 billion defense policy bill has been passed by both the House and Senate, which is generally seen as positive news for the brave men and women who protect our country’s freedoms.
This bill includes significant benefits for service members, such as the largest pay raise in almost two decades, as well as addressing other important issues.
However, some conservatives are outraged by what is missing from the final bill on Biden’s desk.
The House version of the bill contained two key provisions that did not make it into the final version. One provision aimed to prevent federal funds from covering the costs of abortion, while the other sought to prevent a health care program from funding transgender-related hormone treatment and surgeries.
Conservative firebrand Steve Bannon, known for his outspoken views, directed his anger towards new Speaker of the House Mike Johnson for allowing these provisions to be excluded.
Bannon: The NDAA just passed. This is @SpeakerJohnson. I don’t want to hear you’re a Christian. You’ve let all that demonic trash throughout the defense budget. Now you have taxpayers paying for this… you’ve allowed this to happen. You’re just as bad as the bad guys bc you… pic.twitter.com/LTqrS5qgqp
— Grace Chong (@gc22gc) December 14, 2023
Bannon expressed his frustration on his “War Room” podcast, criticizing Johnson for his Christian faith and accusing him of allowing “garbage” and “demonic trash” to infiltrate the defense budget.
Visibly upset, Bannon argued that this kind of leftist ideology is damaging military recruitment numbers and contributing to cultural decay.
“You’re playing footsie with Mitch McConnell, Schumer, and you’re just as bad as the Biden guys,” Bannon directly addressed Johnson. “Because you should know better. So I don’t need to hear any more biblical review. I saw an action.”
Read more: Watch: Fed Up Steve Bannon Goes Off on Speaker Johnson After NDAA Passes
Source: The Western Journal
Why were provisions aimed at addressing illegal immigration, protecting religious liberty, and promoting conservative values within the military ultimately removed from the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2024 during conference negotiations?
Ersion of the bill, which was endorsed by the majority of Republicans, included several provisions that were ultimately removed during conference negotiations between the House and Senate. These provisions included measures aimed at addressing illegal immigration, protecting religious liberty, and promoting conservative values within the military.
One of the main concerns for conservatives is the absence of language that would secure the southern border and address the ongoing immigration crisis. Many conservatives believe that a strong defense begins with securing our borders and ensuring the safety and sovereignty of our nation. The exclusion of these provisions from the final bill has left many conservatives feeling frustrated and disappointed.
Another issue that has caused controversy among conservatives is the lack of protections for religious liberty for service members. There have been numerous reports in recent years of religious discrimination and hostility towards conservative beliefs within the military. Conservatives argue that the National Defense Authorization Act should have included measures to protect the rights of service members to freely exercise their religious beliefs without fear of retaliation or discrimination.
Furthermore, conservatives have expressed concern over the growing influence of progressive ideologies within the military. They argue that the military should remain focused on its primary mission of protecting the nation and should not be a platform for promoting social and political agendas. Many conservatives were hoping that the National Defense Authorization Act would include provisions to ensure that the military remains apolitical and focused on its core mission.
Despite these concerns, the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2024 does include significant benefits for service members. It provides the largest pay raise in almost two decades, which is a positive step in recognizing the sacrifices and dedication of our military personnel. The bill also addresses other important issues, such as modernizing military equipment and improving readiness.
However, for many conservatives, the omissions from the final bill are significant and have overshadowed the positive aspects. They argue that this is a missed opportunity to address key conservative concerns and ensure that the military remains a strong and effective force.
As President Biden reviews the bill and prepares to sign it into law, conservatives are voicing their disappointment and frustration. They are calling on lawmakers and the administration to prioritize the concerns of conservatives and ensure that future defense bills uphold conservative values and address the pressing issues facing our nation.
In conclusion, the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2024 has ignited controversy among conservatives due to the absence of provisions addressing key conservative concerns. While the bill includes important benefits for service members, conservatives argue that it missed an opportunity to secure the border, protect religious liberty, and prevent the military from becoming a platform for progressive ideologies. As the bill awaits President Biden’s signature, conservatives are urging lawmakers and the administration to address these concerns in future defense legislation.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...