Senator Kennedy reveals Biden nominee’s extreme pronoun policy in court.
Senator Kennedy Grills Biden Nominee Over Pronoun Policy in Courtroom
During a confirmation hearing, Senator John Kennedy passionately confronted Judge Mustafa Kasubhai, a far-left nominee from Oregon, over his requirement for people to use gender pronouns in his courtroom. Kennedy criticized Kasubhai’s ability to preside over a fair hearing and accused him of being an activist.
Kasubhai was nominated by President Joe Biden to fill a vacant seat on the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. However, Kennedy expressed strong opposition to his nomination.
Senator Kennedy questioned Kasubhai about his insistence on using gender pronouns in court, emphasizing that while individuals have the right to use different pronouns, it should not be mandated. Kennedy argued that such requirements infringe on personal freedoms and are oppressive.
“When Judge Kasubhai tells people who appear before his court to announce their pronouns, that isn’t ‘voluntary.’ It’s oppressive. Pres. Biden wants him on the federal bench. If I could vote ‘no’ twice, I would.” – Senator John Kennedy
Kennedy further criticized Kasubhai for using his authority to enforce what he believes is politically correct, stating that as a judge, he should not direct litigants to introduce themselves with preferred pronouns. Kennedy disputed Kasubhai’s claim that the usage of gender pronouns in his courtroom is voluntary, asserting that he had read the order and found it to be mandatory.
The senator concluded by expressing his strong opposition to Kasubhai’s nomination and his belief that the judge is not qualified for the federal bench. He also highlighted Kasubhai’s statement that diversity, equity, and inclusion are the heart and soul of the court system, as reported by FrontPage Magazine.
A Note from Our Staff:
Did you know that 90 percent of advertisers will have nothing to do with The Western Journal? The liberal elites have put us on one of their financial kill lists.
They did it because we’ve told the truth and spoken out against them for over a decade. And since they couldn’t shut us up, now, they’re trying to starve us out.
We’re turning to you because, frankly, we have to have your help. It might not sound like much, but just one membership to The Western Journal can make a real difference.
We don’t have a huge staff, big salaries, or deep donor pockets. We’re family-owned and independent. But because we’re independent from the elites, we have to rely on readers like you.
Can we count on you for just a single membership? The cost of a month-long membership is less than a single cup of Starbucks coffee. And, unlike with Starbucks, you can be 100 percent certain that every penny we spend goes toward fighting for traditional American values and against liberal elites.
Please help us continue exposing the truth. Please join today.
Thank you for reading The Western Journal!
The post Watch: Senator Kennedy Exposes Biden Nominee’s Radical Pronoun Policy in Courtroom appeared first on The Western Journal.
What are the arguments for and against enforcing a requirement for individuals to announce their preferred pronouns in court, as demonstrated in Senator John Kennedy’s confrontation with Judge Kasubhai?
Fighting back, but we need your support to continue doing so. If you value independent conservative news, please consider making a donation to The Western Journal today. Every dollar helps. Thank you for being a reader!
The confirmation hearing for Judge Mustafa Kasubhai, a nominee from Oregon, took a heated turn when Senator John Kennedy challenged him over his pronoun policy in the courtroom. This incident reflects the ongoing debate surrounding the use of gender pronouns and the extent to which they should be mandated.
As a nominee for the U.S. District Court, Kasubhai’s beliefs and policies were put under scrutiny. Senator Kennedy, expressing strong opposition, questioned Kasubhai’s requirement for individuals appearing in his court to announce their pronouns. While acknowledging the right of individuals to use different pronouns, Kennedy argued that enforcing such a requirement is oppressive and infringes on personal freedoms.
Kennedy went on to criticize Kasubhai for using his position of authority to impose what he believes is politically correct. As a judge, it is argued that Kasubhai should not direct litigants to introduce themselves with preferred pronouns. Kennedy disagreed with Kasubhai’s assertion that the usage of gender pronouns in his courtroom is voluntary, claiming that he had read the order and found it to be mandatory.
In his concluding remarks, Senator Kennedy expressed his strong opposition to Kasubhai’s nomination, stating his belief that the judge is not qualified for the federal bench. Additionally, Kennedy highlighted Kasubhai’s statement that diversity, equity, and inclusion are at the heart and soul of the court system, suggesting a concern over the potential bias and activist agenda.
This confrontation raises important questions about the balance between personal freedoms and legal requirements in the courtroom. While some argue that using preferred pronouns promotes inclusivity and respect, others maintain that mandating their usage can infringe on individual liberties.
As this debate continues, it is essential for the judiciary system to navigate these issues with impartiality and fairness. The judicial branch plays a crucial role in upholding the Constitution and ensuring equal treatment under the law.
The confirmation hearing for Judge Mustafa Kasubhai has rekindled the discourse surrounding gender pronouns and their place within the courtroom. It remains to be seen how this confrontation and the subsequent nomination will impact the ongoing conversations on personal freedoms, activism, and the influence of political beliefs in the judicial system.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...