Watch: Tim Walz Scrambles, Visibly Shaken After Moderator Presses Him on China Controversy

During a recent vice-presidential debate, Tim Walz faced scrutiny over claims ⁤he​ made regarding his presence in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989. ​Critics have previously fact-checked ‍his assertion, which ⁣Walz reiterated in ⁤various instances, including a podcast‍ earlier‌ this year. Although he claimed he was in Hong Kong at the time, further investigation revealed‍ that he did not actually arrive in China until⁢ August 1989, after the protests had ended.

When confronted⁢ about this discrepancy during the debate, Walz struggled⁢ to provide ⁣a ⁤clear answer and resorted to ⁤discussing his⁤ upbringing in Nebraska and military service, failing to address the‍ question​ directly. His⁣ evasive response drew mockery ⁤online, with many commentators labeling him as a “knucklehead” for his inability to own up to his inaccuracies.‍ The exchange has raised concerns about Walz’s credibility, particularly as it​ builds on ⁢a pattern of⁣ exaggeration in his personal ‍history​ that critics argue undermines his authenticity.


Of all the possible lies about his past that Gov. Tim Walz could have been confronted about by moderators during the vice presidential debate on Tuesday night, the weakest was possibly that he was in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989.

And yet, he still didn’t have an answer for it — acting every bit like a wide-eyed, panicked Don Rickles without the jokes, suddenly finding himself on a vice-presidential debate stage without the slightest hint of why he was there.

As Trending Politics’ Colin Rugg noted on X, “Walz has claimed on multiple occasions that he was in Hong Kong during the tragedy in Tiananmen Square in June 1989.”

This one had been fact-checked pretty extensively before Tuesday.

“As recently as February, Mr. Walz said on a podcast that he had been in Hong Kong, then a British colony, ‘on June 4 when Tiananmen happened,’ and decided to cross into mainland China to take up his teaching duties even though many people were urging him not to,” The New York Times (of all publications) noted.

“It was not true. Mr. Walz, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, indeed taught at a high school in China as part of a program sending American teachers abroad, but he did not actually travel to the country until August 1989,” it added.

Moderator Margaret Brennan explained the circumstances to the audience and then asked, “Can you explain that discrepancy?”

It’s never good when any answer to that question starts with the “I grew up in small, rural Nebraska, town of 400” bromide, but start with it Walz did.

Walz then proceeded to stumble over himself, visibly uncomfortable, for two minutes, explaining how he “rode his bike under the streetlights” with his friends and joined the National Guard and something something something, yadda yadda yadda. You may have noticed none of this answers that question.

He then finally got around to explaining that, as a teacher, yes, he did travel to China, but after the Tiananmen Square protests.

He eventually got around to explaining, long into this shaggy-dog evasion, that sometimes he gets “caught up in the rhetoric” and that he “misspoke on this,” adding that he was a “knucklehead.”

“Now, look, my community knows who I am,” he said during his rambling answer:

I don’t know about his community, but America certainly does:

Even the establishment media, in its polite way, called Walz out.

“Walz has exaggerated certain aspects of his background, and Republicans have tried to point to that as proof that he’s not as authentic as the Harris campaign touts him to be,” MSNBC’s Clarissa-Jan Lim wrote in the live blow-by-blow of the debate on the network’s website.

“Walz stumbled over his response a bit, and him getting caught in yet another instance of overstating his experience is not great. Whether that line of criticism against him resonates with voters remains to be seen.”

He’s lied about his military experience. He’s lied about his China experience, and he’ll gladly lie about the candidate who picked him to be her running mate. No wonder he got the gig. It’s too bad he’s so awful when it comes to the actual practice of lying.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker