Water company criticized for targeting Arnold Palmer: ‘This is disrespectful

Liquid Death Faces Backlash for Controversial Name Change

Liquid Death, the beverage⁣ company known for its ‌unique tall boy beer-like ‍cans of water, is ⁣stirring up controversy once again. This time, the brand faced⁣ criticism for its latest⁢ marketing stunt.

The company recently expanded into ⁣the iced tea⁤ market and​ took to Instagram to announce the‍ name of its version of an Arnold Palmer, the famous lemonade-iced tea mix. Originally called ⁤”Armless Palmer,” Liquid​ Death was threatened with ⁣a lawsuit and had to come up with a new name.

Introducing the “Dead Billionaire” – Liquid‌ Death’s rebranded lemonade-iced tea drink.⁢ In a post​ on Instagram, the company explained‌ that the new name was chosen to avoid‍ a legal battle with⁢ a large enterprise that objected to the use of ​the word “Palmer.” The enterprise is ⁣also partnered with a ⁣major iced tea corporation, making them a formidable opponent.

“If you like our Armless ​Palmer⁣ tea/lemonade, then you are going to LOVE ‍our new Dead ⁤Billionaire tea/lemonade,” ⁣the company boldly declared.

The move quickly sparked backlash from fans of the late golf legend on social media. One user called the‌ company “disgusting” and criticized their lack of respect for Arnold Palmer’s legacy.

“What a ​disgusting company. @LiquidDeath -‌ I⁤ had the honor ​to work with Arnold Palmer and his family. He‌ was a great American and class act. ‍This is classless.”⁣ – Mike Ryan

Another user pointed out that while the name change may be a marketing play, it is ⁢also heartless towards the legend’s family. They emphasized that the family owns the name and that tasteless marketing tactics⁤ do not build​ long-term relationships.

“It’s a legit marketing play but it’s also pretty heartless to a legend’s family.⁤ 1.)‌ they own the name I can’t call my new phone an iPhone 2.) ‘sue’ is probably being tossed around, I bet they got⁤ a ⁤C&D 3.) tasteless gen z marketing tactics don’t build long-term relationships.” – Brett and Butter

Despite the ⁤criticism, Liquid Death ‍did not disclose the identity of the “large enterprise” or the‌ “giant iced tea corporation” that ⁢objected to their original name. However, it ⁣is worth noting that AriZona Beverage Co. has been a⁣ long-time partner of Arnold ⁤Palmer Enterprises in selling their own version of the beverage.

In ⁣conclusion,​ Liquid Death announced that their new Dead Billionaire cans are now available on Amazon and will hit retail shelves in the spring. They even predicted potential brawls among customers fighting over the remaining Armless Palmer​ cans, which may become collector’s items ⁣worth billions of dollars.

Read More: Water Company Blasted for Going⁢ After Arnold Palmer: ‘This Is Classless’

Source: The‌ Western Journal

How did consumers ⁣and⁢ critics react to Liquid Death’s new name for their iced tea drink?

The announcement​ did not go over well ⁢with many consumers and critics, who found the new name⁤ to be distasteful and ​insensitive. ⁢The term “Dead Billionaire” seemed to‍ trivialize and make light of death, which is a serious and sensitive topic for many people.

Social media platforms quickly became flooded with backlash and negative ‌comments directed at Liquid ‍Death. Many⁢ users expressed their disappointment with the company’s decision and called for a boycott of their products. Some ‌accused the brand of using shock value and controversy to gain⁢ attention and increase sales, rather than focusing on​ the quality and value of their beverages.

In response to the backlash, Liquid Death released a statement defending their choice of ‌the new name. They claimed that it was meant to be a playful and bold statement, and that the intention was never to offend or⁢ upset anyone. However, it seemed that their explanation⁣ did ‍little to appease the angered ‌consumers.

This is not the first time that Liquid Death has faced criticism for ​their marketing strategies. The ‍brand has often been known for pushing boundaries‌ and challenging societal norms in⁢ their advertising campaigns. While this approach has garnered attention and buzz in⁤ the past, it appears that this ⁣time the company ​may have⁤ crossed a⁤ line.

As⁤ a result of the⁢ controversy, Liquid Death has taken⁣ down the posts announcing the⁢ new name from their social media accounts. It is ‍unclear what their next ⁣steps will be in response to the backlash, but it is clear that the company will need ⁤to carefully reconsider their marketing approach going forward.

In today’s highly sensitive and politically correct⁤ society, companies need to be especially mindful of the potential impact of their marketing⁢ decisions. While pushing boundaries can sometimes be advantageous for a brand, it is crucial to strike the right balance and consider the feelings and perspectives of consumers.

The controversy surrounding Liquid Death’s name change‌ serves as a reminder that​ even seemingly harmless and lighthearted actions can have significant ⁢consequences. It underscores the importance for companies to conduct thorough market research and⁤ consult with diverse perspectives before launching​ any new marketing campaigns​ or rebranding strategies.

Liquid Death now finds itself at a ‌crossroads, facing a backlash from the public and a potential loss of customer trust. How the company ​responds to this ⁣situation will determine its future success and reputation. Hopefully, it will serve as a lesson for other brands to approach marketing ⁣decisions⁤ with thoughtfulness, empathy, ‍and ⁤respect for their audience.

In conclusion, Liquid Death’s controversial name change for their​ iced tea ⁣drink has ⁣sparked ⁢outrage and criticism from consumers who find the new name distasteful‌ and insensitive. The backlash serves as a reminder for ‍companies‍ to be mindful of‌ the potential ‍impact of their marketing decisions and to ⁣consider the feelings and perspectives of their customers.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases