The federalist

Consider Rome, not for its glories, but for other aspects


The year in “a word,” according to a Dec.​ 22 Financial⁤ Times article, is “The Roman [E]mpire.” The Roman Empire also⁢ happened⁤ to tie into one of the year’s top social media trends, according to The New York Times. That’s pretty impressive, given it was only in September that people the world over were suddenly⁣ fascinated, perplexed, and amused by how often men think about ⁤it.

More than 1 billion ‍people viewed a TikTok video encouraging​ women to ask the men in their lives how often they think about the⁢ subject. “Three times a day,” answers one ‍man to his fiancé in one viral video; in another, a woman’s father explains that using the commode provokes thoughts ⁣of ” ⁣how the Romans invented the modern-day sewage system.”

Granted, there’s plenty to commend a political entity that lasted a thousand years, which at its height ‍controlled an empire spanning three continents and crafted technological ⁣advances that still amaze modern man. And yet, truth be told, the society from ⁢which ⁤that empire issued was already‌ showing signs⁤ of decrepitude during the⁣ life of Christ, a century before ​the empire reached its greatest​ extent during the reign of Trajan. Rome’s greatest victories, in some respects, precipitated and accelerated its downfall.​ As such,‍ they ​serve as a cautionary tale for those seeking to identify the traits of a thriving civilization.

Early Signs ⁢of Imperial Problems

As the story typically goes, Rome propelled herself onto the world stage via strict adherence to republican virtue and civic piety. In three wars with the Carthaginians, the republic proved her mettle, courageously suffering catastrophic ⁢losses — including approximately⁢ 50,000 in a single day at Cannae — but ultimately ⁣triumphed. Just‍ over a century after the end of the Third ‌Punic War in 146 B.C., Rome exerted total dominance over the entire Mediterranean and made significant​ incursions into Gaul, central Europe, and Asia Minor.

And yet, the very same expansion that occurred as ⁤Rome transitioned from a republic to an empire acted to obscure the virtues cementing her success. Originally a cultural backwater of the Mediterranean ‌world, conquest brought her into communication with a rich diversity of ideas, beliefs, and practices that‍ undermined her‍ rigid, family-focused principles. Twentieth-century French scholar and member of‍ the Académie française ⁢Henri Daniel-Rops explains in the first ‌volume of his History of the Church of Christ:

Her conquests led Rome into a kind of spiritual⁤ no man’s⁢ land. Her intake of spiritual ⁢ideas — all those things which form the very basis of a civilization, its interpretation of life, the conception which it has of itself — came less and ⁢less from her own ancient loyalties. As they became more cultured and civilized the Romans deviated more and more from the ideal picture of their race that they had held in bygone days,⁢ regarding it now⁢ as uncouth and old-fashioned.

Even⁢ in ‍the earliest days of the empire, Roman society was already descending into hedonism and backstabbing intrigue — the poet Sextus Propertius called the vacation city of Baiae, ‌ frequented by indulgent, conspiring Roman elites, a “den of licentiousness and vice.” The emperor Augustus instituted laws — the leges Juliae — to combat the scourges of adultery and divorce, ⁢though⁣ with little effect.

“Of‌ late years‍ wealth has made us greedy, and self-indulgence has ‌brought us, through every form⁤ of sensual excess, to be, if I may so put it, in​ love⁢ with death both individual and collective,” observed ancient Roman historian Livy in his History of Rome.

The Unexpected Curses of an Empire

The same Roman generals who​ expanded the empire into ⁣Europe, Asia, and Africa ‍returned to Rome ⁢with⁢ astronomical amounts of gold. Tributes levied on eastern provinces alone amounted to ⁤annual​ deliveries⁤ of 90 ⁣million gold sovereigns.

“In an⁢ era when capital possessed ​few outlets for investment,‍ owing to the lack of large-scale industry,‍ gold merely enabled the common people to stop working, and the idle rich to spend riotously on dwelling-houses, food and drink and material pleasures of all ⁤kinds,” writes Daniel-Rops.

Imagine if​ an entire society won the lottery. Actually, you don’t even need‍ to imagine: The citizens of the exorbitantly wealthy ​(and decadent) Gulf state of Qatar — which has made a fortune off oil and gas — enjoy tax-free ⁤incomes, high-paying government jobs, free health care,​ free higher education, financial support for newlyweds, housing support, subsidies that cover utility bills, and plush retirement benefits.

Roman wealth was based not on ⁢industrial enterprise benefiting the entire social structure but on‍ a monopoly⁤ of gold and land. Wealth was concentrated into fewer and fewer hands — at one point, half of Roman Africa belonged to six men. There arose​ a small class of extremely ‌wealthy individuals intimately connected ⁣with the ​government and separated by a vast financial gulf from the inferior⁣ strata of society.

“A serious lack ⁤of⁣ balance existed between a small, pleasure-loving aristocracy and the enormous mass of the people, which only received the‌ crumbs of all these benefits of‌ Roman civilization,” explains Daniel-Rops.

Military conquests also brought slaves⁤ to Rome in unprecedented numbers, sometimes as much as 150,000 in ​a single campaign. Daniel-Rops writes, “During Augustus’s reign, slaves accounted ⁤for more than one-third of⁤ the population of Rome; in Alexandria, possibly two-thirds.” Consequently, manual labor was no longer performed by the‌ once-idealized⁢ citizen-farmer such as‌ Cincinnatus but by‌ a massive ​underclass of imported slaves. Cities,⁤ in turn, overflowed with unemployed and uprooted peasants, skilled workmen, and visiting foreigners, all of whom were parasitic clients paid for their doubtful loyalty by bread and diverted by⁤ the circus.

The addictive tendencies of indolence and ceaseless entertainment discouraged the once-fecund Romans from family life, and birth rates plummeted. By the beginning of⁢ the second century A.D., to⁣ have⁢ even three ⁢children was quite exceptional. Men‍ of means could shirk marriage and its obligations since, as bachelors with female slaves, they possessed bed companions who could be exchanged as they pleased. And⁤ if these consorts became pregnant, abortion and exposure of ⁢newborn infants (i.e., wanton ‌abandonment) were easy options.

Being Rome May Not ⁢Be‌ a Good Thing

Periodic attempts by the state to curb Rome’s suicidal tendencies — such as Augustus’ leges Juliae, ​ which offered benefits to those‌ who married⁤ and had at least three male offspring‌ — had little effect. The alimenta, a welfare program introduced⁢ in the late first century A.D., seems to have had⁣ similar ‍aims but, like the efforts ​of Augustus, failed to encourage a significant bump ‍in procreation. “A nation is indeed sick at heart if in order to⁣ live decently and to produce children it needs a series of subsidies⁣ and rules to enable it to do so,” argues Daniel-Rops.

A widening uneven distribution of ⁣wealth, the evisceration of ‌an independent middle class and importation of a burgeoning servile⁣ class, the infantilization of the⁢ elites‍ via luxury and mindless entertainment, and the vitiation of the⁣ family for the sake of freedom and pleasure — these‍ were the (unintended) fruits of the Roman imperium. As many scholars and pundits observe, such trends are also visible in a contemporary America ⁣that ‌is experiencing rising inequality, widespread exploitation of immigrants for cheap labor, ⁢a culture of ‍constant ‍amusement, and the abandonment of the family in the name of⁢ autonomy, self-fulfillment, and financial security.​ “We’re DINKs. ⁣We go to Trader Joe’s and ⁣work-out classes on⁣ the weekends,” says a woman in a recent video that epitomizes an America ⁣ suffering the lowest birthrates in its history.

Whether or not America is Rome, the imperium is as much a cautionary tale as it is an ancient marvel. Concurrent with some of its most remarkable achievements, Rome was already steadily decaying within. Even while it continued accumulating territories, its citizens were growing ever weaker and incapable of self-government. The armies it used​ to expand and defend its borders became less Roman and, as ⁤a result, less allegiant to the citizens they swore to⁤ defend.‍ It ​was, after all, a Roman mercenary army⁤ that‌ sacked the eternal city in 410⁢ A.D.

And measures, however well-intentioned, ⁤to renew those ancient Roman mores typically fell flat. “States have always shown themselves completely incapable of restoring their moral foundations once​ they have⁣ allowed them to weaken,” Daniel-Rops opined. If so, it ‍would be good to reflect ⁣on Rome, but perhaps less ‌so for her glories than for​ what lessons we may learn from her descent into oblivion.


rnrn

How can the ​rise and fall of⁤ the Roman Empire serve ​as a⁢ cautionary‌ tale⁢ for contemporary ​societies⁤ facing similar challenges

The Rise ​and Fall ⁣of the Roman ​Empire: ⁣A Cautionary Tale

The⁣ year 2023 has been quite an eventful one.‍ From ‌political ⁢upheavals to social media trends,⁤ there ⁣were many topics that ⁢captivated the attention‍ of the public. However, one unexpected trend emerged that seemed⁤ to fascinate and perplex⁣ people around the world – ⁤the Roman Empire.‌ According to a Financial Times article, the year could be summed up as “The ⁣Roman Empire,”​ and this phenomenon even ⁣made it into the list ⁤of top social media trends‍ of the year, as reported by​ The New York Times.

The fascination with the Roman Empire ⁢began with a TikTok video that ⁤encouraged women to ask the ‍men in their lives how often they think ⁣about this ancient civilization. More than 1 billion people viewed the video, and the responses were both amusing and thought-provoking. Some men admitted to thinking ​about the Roman ‌Empire ​three times a day, while others ⁣related it to ​everyday activities such ⁣as using the commode. ‌This⁢ unexpected ‌trend shed light on ⁣the enduring legacy and fascination with this historic empire.

The Roman​ Empire’s longevity, lasting⁢ for a thousand years and spanning three continents, is certainly commendable. It achieved remarkable ‌technological advancements that still impress modern society. However, beneath its​ achievements, signs of⁤ decay were already⁣ apparent during ‍the time of Christ, a century before its peak ‌under the reign of‌ Trajan. Rome’s greatest victories, ​in some ways, contributed‍ to its downfall. This serves⁣ as a cautionary tale‌ for those seeking ‌to understand ‍the traits of a thriving ​civilization.

Initially, Rome became a dominant force by adhering ​strictly to republican virtues and civic piety. Through ​three wars with the Carthaginians, the republic demonstrated its courage and resilience, even in the face of catastrophic losses. Over a century later, Rome exerted complete dominance over the Mediterranean and expanded into⁤ Gaul, ⁣central Europe, ‍and Asia ⁣Minor. However, this expansion created a cultural clash​ that undermined the principles that had initially led to Rome’s success.

Rome’s ⁤conquests‍ exposed it to a rich diversity of​ ideas and beliefs that deviated from its ancient ‌loyalties and traditions. The once ‌proud and stoic Romans became⁢ more‍ cultured and civilized but also lost touch with ​their roots. Indulgence, ‍intrigue, and hedonism became prevalent ‌within Roman ⁢society. The poet ⁤Sextus Propertius famously‍ described⁣ Baiae, a vacation city frequented by⁣ the Roman elites, as a haven ‌of licentiousness and vice. The emperor Augustus attempted to‍ combat these vices through legislation but with limited success.

The accumulation of wealth⁣ during Rome’s ⁤conquests further exacerbated​ its problems. Gold and land became ​the basis ⁤of Roman wealth, concentrating it ‌into the hands of ​a few individuals. This created a vast ‍financial⁢ gap between the‌ wealthy aristocracy and the masses. ​Slavery also rose to unprecedented levels, with‌ slaves accounting for over one-third of‍ Rome’s population during Augustus’s reign. The influx of cheap labor disrupted the ‍traditional citizen-farmer ‍model, leading to unemployment and⁣ urban overcrowding.

The addictive tendencies of wealth and entertainment eroded the importance ⁤of ‍family ‌and ⁤procreation. Birth rates⁤ plummeted, and the ⁢Roman population declined. Attempts by ‍the state ⁤to incentivize marriage and reproduction through welfare programs ​had little effect.⁢ Rome had lost‌ its ⁣balance ⁤between an aristocracy ⁢driven by pleasure and the ‍majority of the population,⁤ who ⁣received only​ meager⁢ benefits from ⁤Roman civilization.

The decline and ​fall of the Roman⁣ Empire serve as a stark warning for contemporary societies,⁣ particularly those grappling with ⁤rising inequality, exploitation of‌ labor, and the erosion⁤ of family values. Just as Rome⁤ experienced ‍a widening‌ wealth disparity, the loss⁢ of an independent middle ⁣class, and the infantilization of the elites, similar trends can be observed in ⁤present-day ‌America⁢ and many other nations. Learning from history, it is crucial to ‌recognize these ⁣warning signs ​and strive for a more balanced and sustainable ‍society.

In conclusion, the ‌unexpected fascination with the Roman Empire in‌ 2023 highlights its enduring​ legacy and the lessons⁤ it can teach us. The rise and fall of ‍Rome serve ⁢as a cautionary tale for​ civilizations seeking to thrive. By understanding the factors ​that led ‍to Rome’s downfall, societies ‌can avoid similar pitfalls and foster a more equitable, resilient, and prosperous future.


Read More From Original Article Here: We Should Think About Rome — But Not For Her Glories

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker