West Virginia may pass a bill to prosecute libraries over explicit books
West Virginia Legislators Consider Bill to Prosecute Libraries for Carrying Obscene Books
In a controversial move, legislators in West Virginia are currently deliberating on a bill that could have serious implications for libraries across the state. House bill 4654, which was initially scheduled for consideration by the West Virginia House Judiciary Committee on Monday, has now been put before a public hearing. If passed, this bill would remove the previous exclusions that protected schools, public libraries, and museums from prosecution for displaying obscene material to minors, even when accompanied by a parent or guardian.
According to the Parkersburg News and Sentinel, the state code defines obscene matter as anything that an average person believes depicts sexually explicit conduct, nudity, sex, or certain bodily functions. It also includes anything that a reasonable person would find lacking serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Under State Code 61-8A-2, any adult who knowingly and intentionally displays obscene matter to a minor could face felony charges, a fine of up to $25,000, and up to five years in prison if convicted.
Supporters of the bill made their case during the public hearing by reading excerpts from books they deemed obscene, such as “Let’s Talk About It” and “Me, Earl and the Dying Girl.”
The bill’s sponsor, Brandon Steele, R-Raleigh, argued that it is necessary to eliminate the safe haven that allows children to access material that would be considered illegal outside of libraries and schools. He expressed a sense of urgency in moving the bill through the House quickly so that it can be considered by the Senate.
Carol Miley, a retired Kanawha County librarian, voiced her support for the bill, emphasizing that it is not about banning books but rather about protecting minor students from potential harm. She referred to it as “mind rape” or ”word pornography.”
Minister Daniel Curry of the Camden Avenue Church of Christ in Parkersburg also spoke in favor of the bill, stating that it is our responsibility, given by God, to protect our children. He questioned the need for obscene material in schools and libraries.
What are the potential implications of prosecuting libraries for carrying books deemed obscene?
, this bill would allow for libraries to be prosecuted for carrying obscene books.
The bill, introduced by Delegate Joe Jeffries, aims to redefine the state’s obscenity laws and hold libraries accountable for the materials they provide to the public. It argues that libraries have a responsibility to uphold community standards and protect children from explicit and offensive content.
However, the proposed legislation has sparked intense debate and raised concerns about its potential impact on freedom of speech and intellectual freedom. Critics argue that it infringes upon the First Amendment rights of both library users and librarians.
Libraries play a crucial role in providing access to a wide range of materials, including books that cover a diverse range of topics and perspectives. They are often seen as a symbol of intellectual freedom and a cornerstone of democratic societies. By prosecuting libraries for carrying books deemed obscene, this bill could severely limit access to information and stifle intellectual inquiry.
Furthermore, determining what constitutes obscenity is a subjective and often contentious matter. What may be offensive to one person may be considered a valuable piece of literature by another. By placing the burden of censorship on libraries, this bill could lead to a chilling effect on free expression and discourage libraries from acquiring potentially controversial but important works.
Advocates for the bill argue that it is necessary to protect children from exposure to explicit and inappropriate material. They believe that libraries should prioritize the well-being and moral development of young readers over the right to access all types of literature. However, opponents argue that it is the responsibility of parents and guardians to monitor and guide their children’s reading choices, not the role of the library or the government.
It is important to note that libraries already have mechanisms in place to label and categorize materials based on their content. These systems, such as rating systems for movies or age recommendations for books, provide guidance for library users, allowing them to make informed choices based on their own personal values and beliefs.
Rather than imposing punitive measures on libraries, a more constructive approach would be to invest in education and community outreach programs that promote critical thinking and media literacy. By empowering individuals to navigate complex and potentially offensive material, we can foster a more informed and inclusive society.
In conclusion, House bill 4654 represents a significant challenge to the principles of intellectual freedom and freedom of speech. While protecting children from explicit material is a valid concern, the proposed legislation undermines the important role of libraries in providing access to information and stifles diversity of thought. It is crucial for legislators to consider the potential long-term consequences of restricting access to books and supporting alternative solutions that respect both the rights of individuals and the important societal function that libraries serve.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
