What other secrets lie in Biden’s ‘Bidenbucks’ plan to secure the Democratic vote
As the Biden administration transforms federal agencies into a get-out-the-vote army for leftist candidates and causes ahead of November’s pivotal presidential election, the politically weaponized U.S. Department of Justice is doing everything in its power to keep records of the effort under lock and key.
The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) sued the DOJ nearly two years ago in federal court after several federal agencies refused to respond to the organization’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. FGA, among other watchdog groups, wants documents and other communications tied to President Joe Biden’s Executive Order 14019 and the “strategic plans” it required federal agencies to create and use to “promote voter registration and voter participation.”
Zuckbucks on Steroids
Biden signed the constitutionally suspect order in March 2021, not long after the Democrat took office. It commands federal agencies do what legal experts say the executive branch does not have the legal authority to do: expand voter registration and turnout — using White House “approved” third-party organizations to help get the GOTV job done. The sweeping initiative has been billed as “Bidenbucks,” since it uses federal dollars.
Think of Executive Order 14019 as Zuckbucks on steroids, using your money to fund the leftist-led effort.
“This is clearly weaponization of the government for a partisan purpose,” Dave Craig, senior legal fellow at the Foundation for Government Accountability told me recently on “Need to Know with Jeff Angelo” on WHO radio in Des Moines. “The executive order is not only unlawful, it’s totally unconstitutional.”
Craig is not alone in that assessment.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton called Biden’s fiat a “grotesque insult to election integrity, on top of being unconstitutional.” As Paxton said in a press release in 2022, the U.S. Constitution “explicitly grants the power of election oversight to state legislatures.”
“Allowing political appointees at federal agencies to use taxpayer dollars to influence election efforts runs afoul of our election laws, basic fairness, and the desperate need for election security,” Paxton said in 2022 after signing on to a Louisiana-led coalition’s letter warning Biden of his constitutional overreach.
States are primarily in charge of determining the “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections” under the Constitution’s elections clause. It doesn’t say anything about a president using executive branch agencies to “consider ways to expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process,” as Biden’s order directs.
Biden employs the National Voter Registration Act in rewriting the powers of the executive branch, but the 1993 law gives the president no such authority, FGA’s Craig said.
“Not only does the National Voter Registration Act not authorize [federal] agencies to do what they are doing, the president is not the constitutionally mandated authority in the federal government to execute this,” the attorney said.
‘Noteworthy Progress’
Biden’s leftist pals over at the ACLU insist not only that the president has the right to deputize federal agencies to drive voter turnout, but that he needs to do more to realize his “visionary executive order.”
“Building on its promising start, it’s time for the Biden administration and agencies to finish the job and fulfill the promise of the voting access executive order,” Ceridwen Cherry, former staff attorney for the ACLU Voting Rights Project, wrote last March.
In a report titled, “Strengthening Democracy: A Progress Report on Federal Agency Action to Promote Access to Voting,” the ACLU and dozens of leftists partners assert that “A few agencies have made noteworthy progress.” The short list of agencies the ACLU says are “on the right track” for federal election meddling includes the Department of the Interior, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance program in the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
[READNEXT:[READNEXT:‘Bidenbucks’ Stink Emanates From Leftist Group’s Voter Drive In Milwaukee Schools]
In June 2022, the Internal Revenue Service released its Guidance for Promoting Voter Registration at Volunteer Income Tax Assistance and Tax Counseling for the Elderly Sites as part of Biden’s order. The IRS directive includes instructions to “encourage” agency partners to “provide … information to taxpayers” about “how to engage in other non-partisan efforts (such as outreach campaigns) that promote voter participation.”
What could possibly go wrong?
Shrouded in Secrecy
While some agencies have boasted of their Bidenbucks efforts, the Biden administration has mostly kept the public in the dark. Its feverish fight to block disclosure of the records connected to the creation and implementation of the executive order has election integrity advocates like the Foundation for Government Accountability asking: What is Biden hiding?
In July 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida ordered the Department of Justice to respond to FGA’s Freedom of Information Act request and “provide all documents required to be disclosed under FOIA law.” The DOJ finally coughed up 135 pages of documents, a fragment of the 5,500-plus records the agency initially claimed to possess. The documents the department did turn over were heavily redacted, according to the foundation.
According to FGA, the DOJ falsely — and condescendingly — claimed releasing the records, including a 15-page strategic plan to carry out Biden’s order, would only “confuse the public.” In the DOJ’s motion for summary judgment, attorneys argue “such public confusion would result from disclosure of the Strategic Plan because it contains many proposed actions that the public might construe as ‘future commitments, past actions, or provisions already in place.’”
The DOJ also cites presidential communications privilege, which it asserts is “presumptive,”and that it “preserves the President’s ability to obtain candid and informed opinions from his advisors and to make decisions confidentially.”
FGA President and CEO Tarren Bragdon said the DOJ is employing “flimsy excuses to justify concealing key information regarding their participation in government-funded ‘get out the vote’ efforts.”
“President Biden is deeply unpopular. It’s clear his administration has weaponized DOJ to hide records and is using the legal process to run out the clock before the midterm elections,” Bragdon said in a press release following DOJ’s filing.
A mediation hearing was held more than a year ago. The FGA still is waiting for a judge’s ruling on the release of the records.
“The president is acting unconstitutionally, the agencies are acting unlawfully, and they’re doing so with taxpayer money, with next to zero transparency for the taxpayers,” Craig said. “That’s something that has to be fixed.”
Listen to the full interview with Foundation for Government Accountability attorney Dave Craig:
rnrn
What legal action has been taken against the U.S. Department of Justice regarding its refusal to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests related to President Biden’s executive order on voter registration and participation?
The Politicization of the U.S. Department of Justice Under the Biden Administration
In the lead-up to the crucial presidential election in November, the Biden administration has been utilizing federal agencies to advocate for leftist candidates and causes. However, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been actively working to keep records of these efforts concealed from the public eye. This concerning trend of weaponizing government institutions for partisan purposes has sparked legal action and raised questions about the administration’s commitment to transparency and the rule of law.
The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) filed a lawsuit against the DOJ almost two years ago when federal agencies refused to respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Along with other watchdog groups, the FGA seeks access to documents and communications related to President Joe Biden’s Executive Order 14019, which mandated federal agencies to create and employ “strategic plans” to promote voter registration and participation.
This executive order, signed by Biden in March 2021 shortly after taking office, has drawn comparisons to the controversial ”Zuckbucks” initiative. It utilizes federal funds to expand voter registration and turnout, even though legal experts argue that the executive branch lacks the constitutional authority to do so. This initiative has raised concerns about the partisan manipulation of government resources and taxpayer dollars.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has been vocal in denouncing the executive order, describing it as a “grotesque insult to election integrity” that is also unconstitutional. According to Paxton, the U.S. Constitution explicitly grants the power of election oversight to state legislatures, making federal interference through executive orders highly questionable and potentially unlawful.
The Biden administration’s reliance on the National Voter Registration Act to justify these actions further raises legal and constitutional concerns. The act does not grant federal agencies the authority to engage in the activities currently underway, nor does it designate the president as the constitutional authority to execute such actions.
While the ACLU and other left-leaning organizations argue that the president has the right to deputize federal agencies for voter turnout efforts, critics argue that this represents an overreach of power. The ACLU, in a report titled “Strengthening Democracy: A Progress Report on Federal Agency Action to Promote Access to Voting,” highlights a few agencies that they believe are on the right track in promoting federal election meddling. However, the primary responsibility for election oversight lies with the states, as outlined in the Constitution’s elections clause.
The lack of transparency surrounding the creation and implementation of the executive order has further fueled concerns about the administration’s intentions. Despite mounting pressure, the Biden administration has been reluctant to disclose the records and documents related to these efforts. The DOJ’s effort to withhold information and heavily redact the documents it did release has come under scrutiny, with the foundation arguing that such actions only serve to confuse the public.
In conclusion, the politicization of the U.S. Department of Justice under the Biden administration raises serious concerns about the transparency and integrity of the electoral process. The use of federal agencies to further partisan agendas and expand government influence over elections requires careful scrutiny. Upholding the rule of law and ensuring the separation of powers are crucial to safeguarding the integrity of elections and maintaining public trust in the democratic process.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...