Whistleblower: Secret Service ‘Repeatedly’ Turned Down Offer That Might Have Prevented Trump Rally Shooter

A whistleblower has revealed that local police in Butler, Pennsylvania, offered drone support⁣ to secure‌ a ⁤rally for former President Donald Trump on July 13, but the Secret Service⁣ declined these offers. This information was ‌brought​ to light by Republican Sen. Josh Hawley,⁤ who questioned why the Secret Service ‌did not utilize drone technology, especially since a shooter was able to survey the ‍area with his drone prior to the attack.⁢ The whistleblower alleges that the Secret Service’s refusal to use available drone ⁢surveillance was a significant⁣ security failure, particularly⁢ after claiming to have changed ‍their stance after the shooting occurred. Hawley⁤ has ⁣demanded that the Secretary of Homeland ​Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, provide communications regarding the drone coverage‌ by ⁤August 1. The situation has raised⁤ concerns about the adequacy of security measures taken by⁢ federal agencies during ‍high-profile events, while the Secret ⁤Service has faced criticism ​for their actions leading up to​ the⁤ incident.


Local police in Butler, Pennsylvania, repeatedly offered to provide drone coverage in the sky above former President Donald Trump’s July 13 campaign rally, but were turned down by the Secret Service.

This is what a whistleblower said in a bombshell revelation, Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri wrote in a scathing letter to Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who oversees the Secret Service.

“According to reports, the shooter used a drone to survey the site in preparation for his attack,” Hawley stated. “This was confirmed by FBI Director Christopher Wray in his testimony just yesterday.

“In fact, he confirmed that the shooter was operating the drone approximately two hours before President Trump took the stage in Butler, Pennsylvania. This raises an obvious question: why was the U.S. Secret Service (USSS) not using its own drones?”

Hawley continued: “According to one whistleblower, the night before the rally, U.S. Secret Service repeatedly denied offers from a local law enforcement partner to utilize drone technology to secure the rally.

“This means that the technology was both available to USSS and able to be deployed to secure the site. Secret Service said no.”

It is mind-boggling that the agency rebuffed repeated offers of drone coverage from local police, but allowed Thomas Crooks — the 20-year-old man who tried to assassinate former President Donald Trump — to fly his drone above the rally venue before the shooting.

“It is hard to understand why USSS would decline to use drones when they were offered, particularly given the fact USSS permitted the shooter to overfly the rally area with his own drone mere hours before event,” Hawley wrote to Mayorkas.

“The failure to deploy drone technology is all the more concerning since, according to the whistleblower, the drones USSS was offered had the capability not only to identify active shooters but also to help neutralize them,” the senator noted.

According to the whistleblower, the Secret Service changed course and asked local law enforcement to deploy their drones to survey the site after Trump and several rally goers got shot.

Hawley, who torched Mayorkas for allowing “historic” and “staggering security failures,” has asked the DHS secretary to turn over all communications regarding drone coverage at the rally by Aug. 1.

The American public deserves an explanation for the monumentally egregious security lapses that almost got Trump killed and the subsequent stonewalling by the Secret Service and Mayorkas.

The United States is buckling under the strain of daily border invasions, escalating racial tensions and crushing inflation as we teeter on the brink of a third world war.

There is no excuse for the abject incompetence being displayed by bloated federal agencies that receive billions of tax dollars every year but seem unable to justify their existence.






" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker