The federalist

Calling for Israel’s ‘restraint’ is immoral and disrespectful.

Radical Islamic⁢ Forces Launch Attack on Israel

Just as happened 50 years ago, radical Islamic forces launched a murderous assault against the world’s ‌only Jewish state on a Holy Day on the Jewish calendar. They knew Jews would be busy ‍at prayer and holiday observances, making the surprise that much worse. And to say they acted like ‌animals is inaccurate only in that‍ animals are incapable of the level of depravity they proudly recorded on⁤ video.

Calls for “Restraint” in Israel’s Response

  • Barring ​a life-threatening emergency, observant ​Jews do not use electronics or telephones during the Sabbath and holidays — so although reports of‍ the attack trickled through the Jewish community here in America, we were unable to read the news until Sunday evening.
  • There was one thing, though, I knew to‌ expect:‍ calls ⁣for “restraint.” They come after each terrorist atrocity ⁢against Israel, and⁢ this case was no different.

Hamas, of course, never acts with restraint. Restraint entails, among other things, trying⁢ to avoid killing civilians, and Hamas targets civilians. What spokesmen for Egypt, the UAE, Russia,⁢ China, ‍Australia,‍ South Africa, and the UN ⁤secretary-general have called for, then, is ⁤”restraint” in Israel’s response to the worst massacre of ⁤Jews⁤ since ⁤the Nazi Holocaust. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her colleague Rep. Cori Bush used a still more offensive ‌term: “de-escalation.”

These calls are not merely inappropriate and one-sided, but genuinely evil.‌ This pogrom transpired precisely because Israel was pressured into listening ⁣to‌ previous⁢ calls for “restraint.”

Think about it: Not once‌ have world leaders called for restraint from Ukraine. History records no cries for de-escalation as British and American bombers reduced Dresden to rubble⁢ while fighting the Nazis, allied forces pummeled Iraq, or American troops ⁤hunted Osama bin Laden. Nor should there have been. None⁢ of the aforementioned world leaders or members of Congress call for restraint when fighting totalitarians or⁢ terrorists — unless the victims are Jews.

Tellingly, the documentary ⁢series “The Unauthorized History of the Vietnam War,” pillories President Lyndon Johnson’s war policy as “fatal restraint.” Restraint is how⁢ you lose wars. Restraint is how you‍ allow‍ a vicious enemy, driven by hate, to rebuild its capabilities and learn new and crueler ways to inflict violence and terror.

The ⁤Distorted Notion of “Proportionality”

  • Here’s another word bound to ​come up in the coming days: “proportionality.” A correct, moral “proportion” is for⁢ every terrorist to be neutralized, with minimal ‌casualties among their intended civilian targets.
  • Yet global media sources ⁣routinely denounce Israel for not permitting ​the number ​of Jews killed to equal or exceed the number of terrorists and their supporters ​dispatched. It should sicken anyone with a functioning moral compass.

Actually, it does sicken anyone with a functioning moral compass. It’s just that you find precious ⁣few such people at MSNBC or The New York ⁤Times.

The Fallacy ⁤of the “Cycle⁣ of Violence”

  • And a third⁣ depraved cliché: “cycle of violence.” The only cycle here is that of Arab terrorists murdering ‌Jews, and Israel responding to protect its civilians. It is both repugnant⁢ and ridiculous ​to portray⁣ this ​as a two-sided battle. ⁣Was there‌ a “cycle of violence” in the Warsaw Ghetto?

A famous Talmudic dictum from R’ Elazar says⁣ that one who is compassionate to​ the⁤ cruel will, in the end, be cruel to the compassionate. This has immediate applicability ⁣when Hamas has, since 2006, had majority support in the moral sewer that is Gaza,⁣ and Hamas has ⁤now taken the elderly, women, and‌ toddlers captive — in addition to those raped, murdered, and dragged through the streets.

In ‍the ‌current situation, the innocent captives should be the next to cross the border between ⁣Israel‍ and Gaza, safe and unharmed. To provide ⁢Gazans with not ⁢merely transit into Israel,​ but electricity, fuel, and even ​basic supplies is not merely ‍unacceptable, but reprehensible. It is the responsibility of Hamas, not Israel, to ⁤provide these things, and it is overdue for the populace to learn that support for ‌genocidal barbarians is‍ not without costs.

In actuality, ‍it goes far beyond that. Israel made a ‍horrible mistake⁤ in 2006 when it “disengaged” ⁤from Gaza, pulling thousands of Jews from their homes. The idea⁣ of a peaceful Arab ​government in that territory was pure delusion, and, of course, proponents insisted it would never be a⁣ source of terror — and that Israel would re-occupy that territory if it were ever to attack. Israel repeatedly failed to do precisely that,⁢ as Hamas and ‍Palestinian Islamic Jihad repeatedly⁤ launched unprovoked attacks from Gaza.

Israel must fail ​no longer. Referring to Hamas, Netanyahu⁤ claimed Israel will “defeat them to⁣ the end,” but mollified this by saying Israel would destroy the “capabilities” of Hamas. No. The presence of Hamas alongside Israel places every Israeli civilian in ​jeopardy; it is far overdue for that danger to be⁣ removed. Israel must utterly destroy⁢ Hamas, and ‌this war cannot end ​until ⁢the white flag of surrender flies ‌from the pile of concrete that was ⁣once the Hamas center of operations.

Anything else would be a moral failing of disastrous proportions,⁤ one‌ that will⁤ surely⁣ bring future horrors in its wake.


What⁤ double standard do world leaders exhibit in their response to Israel’s defense‌ compared to other ‍nations combating terrorism?

The streets as a show of their savagery. Yet, ⁢the world has the audacity ​to call for “restraint” from Israel.

Let us be clear: Israel has the right to defend itself. It has the right to protect its citizens from ​the constant threat of terrorism. It has the right to respond to ​these attacks with the necessary force to ensure the safety and security‌ of its people. To deny Israel this right ⁢is to perpetuate⁢ the cycle of violence and give terrorists the ‌upper ‍hand.

The Hypocrisy of World Leaders

It is deeply disturbing to witness ⁤the hypocrisy ⁢of world leaders in their response to these attacks. While they condemn Israel for defending itself, they remain silent when other nations use force to combat terrorism. This double standard must be exposed and condemned.

We cannot allow political biases⁣ to cloud our judgment or‌ dictate our response ‍to acts ‍of terror. We must stand united in our support for Israel, in our condemnation of terrorism, and in our commitment to justice and peace.

As we mourn the lives lost in this heinous attack on Israel, let us also remember the resilience⁢ and strength of the Jewish people. Throughout history, they have faced persecution and adversity, yet they have always emerged stronger.‌ This attack will not break their spirit or shake their resolve. Israel will rise above ⁣this evil and⁤ continue to stand as a beacon ‍of hope and freedom in the ​Middle East.

It is time for the world to stand with Israel, to support its right to defend itself, and to condemn the radical Islamic forces that seek to destroy it. Only through unity and unwavering determination can we defeat terrorism and ensure a peaceful future for all nations.

May the victims of​ this attack rest in peace, and may Israel find the⁢ strength to​ overcome this tragedy.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker