Why did Congress eliminate language from The Defense Bill that Protects Military Kids From Trans Insanity

Schools servicing military kids are targeting parents and teachers alike who question administrators’ sexual agendas, and Congress chose to let it continue in the defense bill just signed into law over Christmas.

A mom concerned about her child’s health was interviewed in November posted On social media, she expressed her shock at what she saw. “artwork” She was 7 years old when she was asked what by her elementary school teacher upon her entry. “polysexual” meant. The answer was quick, but not in a way you might expect. Army officer at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey called state and local law enforcement and used base security forces to monitor the supposedly unsafe situation she had created in the school district where more than half of the students are children of active-duty military personnel.

Another example from this year: A teacher at an on-base, non-Department of Defense (DOD) school who refused to use a student’s “preferred” The school then disciplined the student. Such forced political ideology isn’t isolated to non-DOD schools that serve military bases; it’s also happening in federally run Department of Defense Education Activity (DODEA) schools, which are schools expressly created for the children of military personnel.

Many members of Congress have taken the initiative to bring attention to the political indoctrination which has infiltrated DODEA. Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York introduced the Servicemember Parents Bill of Rights, which was included in its entirety in the first House-passed version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2023.

Unfortunately, final language agreed upon by the House and Senate and signed into law by President Joe Biden on Dec. 23 was significantly watered down — and it requires no change in practice or acknowledgment of wrongdoing by DODEA. 

Protections Watered Down

The most important parts from Stefanik’s amendment — that clarified that schools must be transparent with parents when it comes to the contents of teacher training, library books, and medical treatment of their children at school — were removed.

For example, Stefanik’s amendment stipulates that DODEA schools should “make all … educator professional development materials, including teachers’ manuals, films, tapes, books or other reading materials, or other supplementary materials used in any survey, analysis, or evaluation, available for inspection by the parents of children attending the school.” It states that DODEA schools must be open at the beginning of each school year. “provide parents a list of reading materials in the school library, including a list of any reading materials that were added to or removed from the list of materials from the prior year.”

What is the point of such clarification? Senators and congressmen would have taken the time to investigate and listen to claims made in their respective armed service committees by Stefanik and Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Rep. Vicky Hartzler (R-Mo.) about the 2021 Equity and Access Summit. This official DODEA teacher training was where presenters admitted to secretly changing children to another gender at DODEA schools.

If they had taken this concern seriously our legislators would have looked at the entire training or at most the complete.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases