The federalist

DOJ Conceals Hunter Biden’s Charging Decisions with Smoke and Mirrors

A Government Official⁣ Confirms‍ IRS Whistleblower Claims of DOJ Interference in Hunter Biden⁢ Investigation

A top government official has confirmed the claims made by IRS whistleblowers that the Justice Department ⁣hindered the investigation into Hunter Biden. However, this same official refuses to‌ acknowledge that Attorney General Merrick Garland and U.S. Attorney ⁢David Weiss misled Congress⁤ with their assertions that Weiss had ultimate authority over the investigation.

It is clear that Weiss and⁤ the ⁣Department of Justice are sticking to their⁤ story. This should be enough reason for the House to stop deferring ‍to the Justice Department’s⁣ excuse of an “ongoing investigation” and start taking⁤ action. The⁤ Oversight Committees​ must issue​ and enforce subpoenas to expose the DOJ’s cover-up of Biden-family corruption and its cover-up of the cover-up.

New Details⁢ Emerge from House Judiciary ‍Committee ⁢Interviews

The House Judiciary Committee’s ⁣recent series ⁢of‍ transcribed​ interviews has been​ shedding light on the DOJ and⁤ FBI’s obstruction of the Hunter Biden investigation and Biden-family corruption. Stuart Goldberg, the top official ​for the criminal division of the tax division at the DOJ, provided additional information⁤ during his interview that confirmed the complaints made by IRS whistleblowers‍ regarding the‍ Justice Department’s interference in their investigation.

Goldberg explained that the tax division of Main Justice ‌is ‌responsible for ⁢deciding whether to open a‍ grand jury investigation and authorize the‌ prosecution of tax offenses in⁣ tax crime investigations. He also revealed that certain‌ investigative steps, such as approving attorney subpoenas, require the approval of ⁣the⁣ tax division. In sensitive cases like the Hunter Biden case, there would typically be closer supervision and authorization at a higher level⁢ than usual.

Furthermore, Goldberg testified that the ‌tax division’s approval was necessary before a U.S. attorney’s office ⁢could bring felony ⁤tax charges, and they even had control over which specific charges could be brought.

When questioned about what would happen‌ if the tax⁢ division refused to approve charges, Goldberg mentioned that the U.S. attorney’s office‌ could⁣ appeal to the deputy attorney general to resolve the dispute. However, he​ stated that this had only happened once in the last three ⁢years.

IRS whistleblowers had previously testified that ‍they needed approval from D.C. before taking certain investigative steps and that U.S. Attorney Weiss had claimed he was not the ⁤final decision-maker in the Hunter Biden case. ‌When asked to confirm these claims, Goldberg was directed not to answer.⁣ The House Judiciary ⁣Committee then shifted⁢ its focus to ​the primary decision-maker in‌ the case.

Goldberg’s response ‍was evasive, stating that ⁤Weiss was leading and running the case, but the tax division ‌had responsibilities to review and approve certain aspects. Any disagreements or differences of opinion would have ⁣to be ‍decided by someone in higher authority.

While Goldberg’s explanation aligned with what the IRS whistleblowers ​had stated, he refused to acknowledge the contradiction presented by Weiss’s⁣ letter claiming to be the ultimate decision-maker.

Goldberg justified Weiss’s statement by emphasizing that the Tax Division has the responsibility to authorize or not authorize‍ cases according to the Department’s policies. He suggested that Weiss’s ultimate authority was subject to⁢ the⁤ Department’s rules and policies.

When questioned about Garland’s ⁢statement⁤ regarding Weiss’s​ authority over all matters pertaining to Hunter Biden, Goldberg implied that the ⁢Attorney General’s statement meant ⁢that individuals have full authority to ⁤conduct their work within‍ the Department’s policies,⁣ unless⁤ specifically disagreed with by the Attorney General.

Goldberg’s cleverly worded response may provide cover for Weiss and ⁢Garland, but to the ⁣American people, it reeks of a cover-up. This is a cover-up of ‍a cover-up.


​Why is it concerning that Attorney General Merrick Garland and U.S. Attorney David Weiss ⁤allegedly misled Congress about Weiss’s authority over the investigation?

Iously alleged that the Justice Department was interfering⁣ in the investigation into Hunter Biden, and ‍now a top⁣ government official has confirmed their claims. However, this official refuses to acknowledge ⁣that Attorney General Merrick Garland and U.S. Attorney David Weiss misled ⁤Congress with their assertions that Weiss had ultimate authority over the investigation.

It is concerning that Weiss and ‌the Department of Justice are sticking to their story. This should be enough reason for the House to stop deferring to the Justice Department’s excuse of an “ongoing investigation” ​and start taking action. The Oversight Committees must issue and enforce subpoenas to expose the DOJ’s cover-up of Biden-family corruption and its cover-up​ of the cover-up.

New details have emerged from the House Judiciary Committee’s recent series of transcribed interviews, shedding light on the DOJ and FBI’s obstruction of the Hunter Biden investigation and Biden-family corruption. During his interview, Stuart ‌Goldberg, the top official for the criminal division of the tax division at the DOJ, provided ‍additional information that confirmed the complaints made by ‍IRS whistleblowers regarding the‍ Justice Department’s interference in their investigation.

Goldberg explained that the tax division of Main Justice‌ is responsible for deciding whether to open a grand jury investigation and authorize the prosecution of tax offenses in⁣ tax crime investigations. He also revealed that certain investigative steps, such as approving attorney subpoenas, require⁣ the ‌approval of the tax division.⁤ In‍ sensitive cases like the Hunter Biden case, there would typically be closer supervision ‍and authorization at a higher level than usual.

Furthermore, Goldberg ⁢testified that the ⁢tax division’s approval was necessary before a‍ U.S. attorney’s office could bring felony tax charges, and they even ‌had control over which specific charges could be brought.

When questioned about what would happen if the tax division refused to ⁣approve charges, Goldberg mentioned that the U.S. attorney’s office could appeal⁤ to ⁤the deputy attorney general to resolve the dispute. ‍However, he stated that this had only happened ‍once in the last three years.

These revelations ‌from the House ⁢Judiciary Committee interviews strengthen the claims made by IRS whistleblowers and demonstrate the extent of the Justice Department’s ⁣involvement in hindering the investigation into Hunter Biden. ‌It is ⁣imperative that the House takes immediate action and issues subpoenas to uncover ⁢the truth and hold those responsible ⁤accountable.

The American people deserve transparency and honesty from‌ their government officials, as well as a thorough investigation into any allegations of corruption. The House has a duty to ensure that justice is served and that the truth ⁤is ⁤uncovered in the Hunter Biden investigation. Failure to do so would undermine the integrity of our justice system ‍and erode public trust in our government.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker