WHO urges significant global tax hikes on alcohol and soda

The World Health Organization’s Plan to Take Away Your Freedoms

The World Health ⁢Organization⁢ (WHO) is proposing a dangerous⁣ idea: using taxes to restrict ⁢your choices ⁢and control your life. In a ⁤recent news release, WHO called⁢ for massive global tax hikes on alcohol and sugary drinks, ​claiming that a⁤ 50% price ⁤increase would‌ lead ‍to healthier⁢ societies.

But let’s not be ‍fooled by their seemingly noble intentions. The real motive behind these tax increases is​ the ‌staggering $17 trillion in additional revenue it would generate. WHO sees people as mere pawns in their quest for more ‍money and power, disregarding individual‍ freedom.

Dr. Rüdiger Krech, WHO’s director⁤ of health promotion, paints a utopian picture of taxing unhealthy products, claiming it creates healthier populations and prevents violence and injuries. But where does it end? Will they⁣ tax meat, gasoline-powered ‍vehicles, guns, and everything else ⁣in the name of “protecting” our health?

What WHO is essentially proposing is ​a ban on alcohol ⁢and soda for the poor, while the wealthy can indulge without consequence. This discriminatory approach is unacceptable.

Should the World Health Organization be abolished?

• Yes
• No

I don’t know about you, but where I’m from, a ⁤six-pack of beer is already too expensive. Taxing it even more would ​force me ⁢to‌ give up drinking ​or resort to finding​ cheaper alternatives.‌ History has ‍shown‍ us that when alcohol was prohibited, ‍crime ⁢thrived and bootleggers profited.

WHO is nothing more than a puppet ​of⁤ the ⁢World Economic⁣ Forum and the Chinese⁤ government. They want to play God by taking away our God-given rights. But the truth is, curbing ⁣individual‌ freedoms won’t fix our broken‍ world. Only God, through Jesus Christ, can bring true healing.

Source: World Health Organization Calls‌ for Huge Global Tax Increases on Alcohol, Soda

Originally published on The Western Journal.

How ⁣does‌ the World Health⁢ Organization’s proposal to increase taxes on sugary drinks and tobacco products raise questions about personal freedom⁤ and individual autonomy?

⁤ Recent report, the WHO has suggested implementing higher taxes on products that⁢ are harmful to‍ health, such as sugary drinks and‍ tobacco. While this may seem like a noble effort to promote public health, it ‌raises serious concerns about personal ⁢freedom and ⁢individual ⁢autonomy.

Firstly, it⁣ is important to acknowledge the importance of public health‌ initiatives and⁢ efforts⁢ to combat harmful substances. Many studies have shown the ⁣detrimental effects of sugary drinks and tobacco on people’s health, and it is crucial to find ‌effective ways to reduce their consumption. However, the WHO’s proposed solution of increasing taxes‍ on⁣ these items raises ⁢questions about the role of government and the limitation of personal choice.

By implementing such ⁤taxes, ‍the WHO ⁣is essentially trying to manipulate individuals’ behaviors by ⁢incentivizing certain choices while discouraging ‌others. This‌ strategy may be well-intentioned, but it encroaches upon people’s freedom to make their own decisions. It seems as though the WHO believes that it knows what is best for individuals and ‌that it has‍ the authority to regulate⁢ their choices.

Moreover, this taxation plan ​creates a slippery slope towards further government intervention in⁣ our lives. If the WHO is successful‍ in implementing taxes‌ on sugary drinks and ⁢tobacco, what prevents ‍them from increasing taxes ​on other ⁣products they deem harmful⁢ in⁣ the future? This could lead to a situation where the government is ​dictating what we can and cannot consume, undermining our individual freedoms and rights.

Additionally, it is crucial to consider ‌the disproportional impact‍ of such taxes on lower-income individuals. Research has consistently shown⁢ that those‍ in lower socioeconomic brackets are more likely to consume ‌sugary drinks and ​tobacco products. By increasing taxes on these items, the WHO may inadvertently be⁤ placing an additional financial burden on these already disadvantaged populations, further exacerbating existing inequalities.

Furthermore, this taxation strategy⁢ fails to address the ⁤root causes of unhealthy behaviors. Higher taxes may ‌discourage ‌some individuals‍ from consuming sugary drinks or tobacco, but they⁢ do not address‍ the underlying factors that lead to these choices,⁤ such as limited access to healthy alternatives or lack of education on nutrition. Instead of solely ‌relying on taxes, efforts ⁤should be made to promote⁢ healthier⁤ options,⁢ provide education, and ensure​ equal access to resources for all individuals.

In conclusion, while the World ‌Health Organization’s plan to increase taxes on harmful products may be well-intentioned, it raises significant‌ concerns ‌about personal freedom, ​government⁤ intervention, and potential inequalities. Public health initiatives should prioritize education, access to‌ resources, and empowering individuals to make informed choices, rather than resorting to taxation ‍as a means of control. ⁢It is essential to strike a balance between ⁤promoting public health and safeguarding individual freedoms, as ⁢both are crucial for a thriving⁢ and equitable society.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases