The daily wire

Steve Garvey criticizes Adam Schiff for deceiving 300 million people in CA Senate debate

California Senatorial Candidates Engage in Fiery Debate

In a heated ‍debate among four California senatorial candidates, the atmosphere was⁣ tense as accusations flew and tempers⁣ flared. With three Democrats and one Republican ‌on stage, the clash between former MLB All-Star Steve Garvey and ⁢Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) ⁤took‌ center stage.

Joining ‌Garvey and⁢ Schiff were California‍ Reps. Katie Porter and ⁢Barbara Lee, ⁣making it a battle⁤ of political heavyweights.

Garvey didn’t hold back,⁤ directly accusing Schiff of lying⁢ to the American people. “I think you’ve been censured for lying,” Garvey boldly stated.

Not one to back down, Schiff ⁣fired back at Garvey, launching an attack on former President⁣ Donald Trump.‌ He passionately defended himself, saying, “I was just ⁢called a liar by Mr. Garvey. ‍Mr. Garvey, I‌ was ​censured for standing up ⁣to ⁢a corrupt president. And you know something? I would do it all over again.”

“Because ‌that corrupt president, that president has⁣ been⁤ indicted with ⁣91 felony ‌counts, that president ‌that you won’t refuse‍ to support. Yeah, he’s ⁣a danger, and I will stand up to him and (former House Speaker) Kevin McCarthy and Jim Jordan‍ and any ⁢of those MAGA enablers ⁤of his in the⁢ Congress. The⁤ reason why our democracy‍ is in trouble is because folks‍ don’t have the courage⁤ to stand ⁣up when they need ⁣to.”

Garvey ⁤didn’t let Schiff’s response slide. He fired back,​ “Sir, you lied to 300 million people and⁢ you can’t take that back.”

Censure Resolution Reveals Damning ‍Allegations Against Schiff

The censure⁣ resolution passed in June 2023 against Schiff shed light on the allegations against him. The‌ resolution declared that the claims of collusion between ⁣President Donald ⁣Trump ​and Russia in the​ 2016 Presidential election were proven ​false by ⁣multiple thorough investigations.

Furthermore, the resolution accused Schiff of abusing⁤ the⁢ trust placed in him as the former chair of the House Intelligence‍ Committee. It stated that he had⁣ access to sensitive intelligence that most Members⁤ of​ Congress did not have, and he had ⁤misused this privilege.

The resolution went on to ⁤highlight Schiff’s spread ⁤of false accusations regarding collusion and his dishonest⁢ behavior, including denying his ⁤staff’s communication with⁤ a whistleblower during the⁤ first impeachment of President Trump.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

According to the resolution, Schiff’s ⁢actions hindered the Intelligence Committee’s oversight responsibilities over the Intelligence ⁢Community,⁤ posing a threat‌ to national security. It concluded by asserting that Schiff had misled the American people and brought disrepute upon the‍ House‌ of Representatives.

How⁤ did Lee ‌defend her​ record and counter Porter’s criticism during the debate

To criticize,” Schiff continued. “So, if you want to accuse me of lying, go ahead. But I stand by my words, and I stand by my actions ⁤of holding the president accountable.”

Porter and Lee, while not involved in the direct exchange between Garvey and Schiff, had their fair share of confrontations as well. Porter, known for her progressive policies, criticized Lee for not being progressive enough on issues⁣ such as healthcare and climate change.

“We need bold and transformative change,” Porter‌ asserted. “We can’t afford ⁢to be timid when it comes to the urgent crises we are facing. And I believe my record shows that I am willing to take ‌bold steps to address these issues.”

Lee, on the other hand, defended her record, highlighting her long-standing commitment to​ social justice and racial equality.

“I have been fighting for the​ marginalized communities for decades,” ‌Lee countered. “I have pushed for criminal justice reform, affordable housing, and educational equity. I may ⁢not align with every aspect of the progressive agenda, but I have consistently fought for⁤ equality ⁣and justice.”

The debate covered a wide range of topics, from immigration to ‌gun control to ‌the economy. Each ​candidate passionately presented their ⁤positions and sparred with their opponents, sometimes leading to heated exchanges.

Overall, the fiery debate showcased the sharp differences in ideologies and strategies ⁤among‌ the California‍ senatorial candidates.‍ With the election approaching, voters will have to ⁣carefully consider where each candidate stands on the issues that matter most to them.

As the race for the California Senate seat⁢ continues, it is clear that the candidates are not backing‍ down and are willing to engage in fierce debates to win over voters. ⁤The outcome of this election ‍will have significant ‌implications for ‌California and⁣ the nation as a whole.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker