The daily wire

Trump’s former ambassador to Israel criticizes Rashida Tlaib for anti-Israel remarks, calling her a “virulent antisemite.”

Former Ambassador Slams Rep. ⁣Rashida Tlaib for Anti-Israel Stance

David Friedman, the former U.S. ambassador to Israel‍ under President⁤ Donald Trump, didn’t hold back ⁤in his criticism of Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib ⁤(MI) after she was censured by ‌the House on Tuesday.

Tlaib faced censure from nearly two dozen House⁢ Democrats for spreading false narratives about the‌ Hamas attacks on Israel ​and advocating for the destruction of the state of Israel. She has even accused Israel of genocide and‌ supported the controversial slogan “from the river⁤ to the sea, Palestine will be⁣ free,” which implies that‌ Israel should not exist.

Friedman⁣ directly challenged Tlaib, asking her if Israel has a right to exist. He stated⁣ that​ if she answers⁤ no, she should leave Congress as a treasonous Jew hater, and⁣ if she ⁣answers‍ yes, she must explain how Israel can coexist‍ with ​Hamas ‌on its border. According‌ to Friedman, Israel is at war with Hamas ‌precisely because such coexistence is impossible.

The former ambassador also highlighted the stark contrast between Israel’s efforts to minimize casualties⁤ and Hamas’ deliberate strategy of using Palestinian children as pawns in their‌ military ⁤operations.

Friedman concluded by urging Tlaib to either condemn Hamas or leave⁣ the country and join them.

Tlaib responded to the censure on X, claiming that her colleagues were silencing​ her and ​accusing those who voted for ​the resolution ‌of disregarding Palestinian lives.

She emphasized her commitment to calling ‍for a mutual⁢ ceasefire, ⁣the release of hostages and detainees, the delivery of humanitarian aid, and the safe return of Americans. Tlaib also expressed her dedication to achieving‍ a just‍ and lasting peace that respects the ⁤rights and dignity of all people, promotes‌ peaceful ‌coexistence between Israelis and Palestinians, ​and ensures no one lives⁤ in fear​ of violence.

Friedman, however, dismissed Tlaib’s perspective, stating that her attempt to equate ruthless murderers, rapists, and baby killers with those fighting against ⁢them only adds insult to injury.

Related: U.S. House Votes To Censure Democrat Rashida Tlaib For Supporting Genocide ‍Of⁢ Israel

⁤ What are the practical challenges of peaceful coexistence ‌between Israel and Hamas?

⁤Explain how Israel can coexist with Hamas on its border as⁤ it tries to annihilate the country!⁤ While ‍you ponder this, try also to imagine 4000 rockets being fired at your home ⁢town in under a month. pic.twitter.com/0nIfk2zLrX

— David⁢ M. Friedman (@DavidM_Friedman) May 25, 2021

Tlaib’s stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long been a subject of controversy. Her support for the​ Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel has drawn criticism from ⁣pro-Israel advocates who view ⁢it as ⁤a campaign⁣ to delegitimize and isolate the state of Israel.

Her ⁢recent remarks ​about‍ Israel​ and⁢ her alignment with Hamas have only intensified the criticism against‍ her. Accusing Israel ⁢of genocide is⁤ a serious allegation, and spreading false narratives⁢ about the ⁤Hamas attacks on ⁢Israel undermines the complexity of the conflict.

David Friedman’s questioning of Tlaib is an​ important reminder of⁤ the fundamental values that underpin the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. By asking whether Israel has‍ a right to exist, Friedman is ​challenging Tlaib to confront the core issue⁤ at stake – the​ legitimacy⁤ of Israel⁣ as a nation-state.

Friedman also highlights the⁢ practical challenges of coexistence between Israel and Hamas. The constant threat ​of ⁢rocket attacks and terrorism from​ Hamas makes peaceful coexistence nearly impossible. Israel’s efforts to protect its citizens and minimize casualties stand ⁤in stark‍ contrast to Hamas’ deliberate use of innocent Palestinian children as human ​shields.

The former ambassador’s⁤ call for Tlaib​ to either⁢ condemn ‍Hamas or leave the country may be seen as controversial, but it raises ⁤important questions about political accountability ‍and the consistency of⁤ one’s beliefs. If Tlaib truly ⁢believes in justice and equality, she should recognize ‍and condemn the actions of‌ Hamas, a terrorist organization that ⁢targets innocent civilians.

It is‌ essential to foster constructive dialogue and understanding​ in the Israeli-Palestinian ​conflict. However, inflammatory rhetoric, false⁢ narratives, and support for extremist ideologies only‌ serve to ⁤further⁤ divide the⁣ parties involved and hinder ⁤any ‍chances of achieving peace.

The censure faced by⁤ Tlaib⁤ from her fellow⁣ Democrats sends⁤ a ⁣message that her anti-Israel stance ⁤is not representative of the broader party’s position. It is ‌crucial to maintain a balanced and nuanced approach ⁤to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, acknowledging the complexities and striving⁤ for a peaceful ‍solution that ⁢respects the ⁢rights and⁢ security of both Israelis and Palestinians.

In conclusion,⁣ David Friedman’s criticism of ⁤Rep. Rashida Tlaib is significant ​in ‌shedding light on the consequences of⁣ anti-Israel‍ rhetoric‍ and the challenges of coexistence‍ between Israel and its adversaries. It underscores the ⁢need for responsible and informed discussions on the Israeli-Palestinian‌ conflict, which ultimately hold‌ the key to a lasting and just resolution to this longstanding​ dispute.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker